Home > Journals > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche > Past Issues > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2015 June;174(6) > Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2015 June;174(6):281-90

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Cite this article as

GAZZETTA MEDICA ITALIANA ARCHIVIO PER LE SCIENZE MEDICHE

A Journal on Internal Medicine and Pharmacology


Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche 2015 June;174(6):281-90

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Acute effects of an intensity- versus load-controlled resistance exercise protocol on time-under-tension and physical work in older adults

Morat T. 1, Luenzer S. 2, Preuss P. 3, Mechling H. 1

1 Institute of Movement and Sport Gerontology, German Sport University, Cologne, Germany; 2 VIP‑Training, Variable Individual Prevention GmbH, Cologne, Germany; 3 University Sport, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany


PDF  


AIM: Good muscular strength is decisive to manage tasks of daily life and to prevent falls. However, within recommendations of resistance training for counteracting the age-related loss of muscle mass, is a lack of information about training control. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the implementation of two different protocols of training control (intensity-controlled through percentage [%] of maximum strength [1RM] versus repetition-controlled) during resistance training with older adults on time-under-tension (TUT) and physical work.
METHODS: Fourteen older adults (age of 64.8±3.1 years) participated in this cross-sectional test-retest study and were measured at an interval of one week with two different protocols (intensity-controlled [CInt] versus repetition-controlled [CRep]) in the exercise ‘seated chest press’.
RESULTS: Within CInt, the repetitions were reduced by about 49% across the sets; in CRep the load was reduced by about 20% across the sets. There was no significant difference with respect to executed repetitions and TUT between CInt and CRep, but there was a significant difference between single sets (p<0.001). Physical work demonstrated a significant reduction across the sets in CRep. Total physical work was higher in CRep (4934 N•m) compared to CInt (4349 N•m).
CONCLUSION: A target number of repetitions with adapted load (repetition-controlled protocol) in consecutive sets was preferable if a high amount of physical work should be achieved and load intensity should not increase in subsequent sets. With the repetition-controlled protocol, high mechanical and metabolic stress is presumable, resulting in higher hypertrophic effects.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Morat T, Luenzer S, Preuss P, Mechling H. Acute effects of an intensity- versus load-controlled resistance exercise protocol on time-under-tension and physical work in older adults. Gazz Med Ital - Arch Sci Med 2015 June;174(6):281-90. 

Corresponding author e-mail