Advanced Search

Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2015 December;51(6) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2015 December;51(6):745-53

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE

A Journal on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation after Pathological Events

Official Journal of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM), European Union of Medical Specialists - Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section (UEMS-PRM), Mediterranean Forum of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (MFPRM), Hellenic Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (EEFIAP)
In association with International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM)
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,063

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 1973-9087

Online ISSN 1973-9095

 

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2015 December;51(6):745-53

    ORIGINAL ARTICLES

A proposal for an Italian minimum data set assessment protocol for robot-assisted rehabilitation: a Delphi study

Franceschini M. 1, Colombo R. 2, Posteraro F. 3, 4, Sale P. 1

1 Department of Neurorehabilitation, IRCCS San Raffaele‑Pisana, Rome, Italy;
2 Service of Bioengineering, “Salvatore Maugeri” Foundation, IRCCS, Pavia, Italy;
3 Laboratory of Rehabilitation Bioengineering, Auxilium Vitae Rehabilitation Center, Volterra, Pisa, Italy;
4 Rehabilitation Department, Versilia Hospital‑AUSL12, Camaiore, Lucca, Italy

BACKGROUND: At present there is no agreement on a common evaluation protocol to assess improvement in stroke patients after robotic therapy.
AIM: The aim of this study was to identify a Minimum Data Set Assessment Protocol, using an agreement-based survey.
DESIGN: A Delphi survey.
SETTING: This study was conceived by the Italian Robotic Neurorehabilitation Research Group (IRNRG), an Italian group involved in the clinical application of robot-assisted rehabilitation devices
POPULATION: Stroke subjects.
METHODS: A 3-round Delphi survey was carried out through the electronic submission of questionnaires to a panel of experts identified in fourteen rehabilitation centers. For each generated item, experts were asked to rate questions on a 5 point Likert Scale.
RESULTS: After the 1st round the questionnaire was filled out by 43 (84.3%) out of 51 experts invited to participate in the study. In the 2nd and 3rd rounds we explored the specific evaluation tools for each of the ICF domains identified in the 1st round. The experts identified the following assessment tools for the upper limb: the Ashworth Scale, the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale, the Frenchay Arm Test, the Medical Research Council scale, the Motricity Index, Frenchay Activities Index and Modified Barthel Index; and for the lower limb: the Ashworth Scale, the Motricity Index, the 10 meter walking Test, the 6 minutes walking Test, the Functional Ambulatory Classification, the Timed Up and Go Test, the Walking Handicap Scale, the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion, the Heart Rate, the Medical Research Council Scale, the Tinetti Balance Scale and the Modified Barthel Index.
CONCLUSION: The Delphi survey presented in this study allows the identification of a shared assessment protocol to be applied in clinical practice and research for the evaluation of the real improvement related to robot-assisted rehabilitation of the upper and lower limb in patients after stroke.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Clinicians and researchers could use the results of this study to obtain a common language in robotic rehabilitation assessments.

language: English


FULL TEXT  SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL  REPRINTS

top of page