Advanced Search

Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2015 April;51(2) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2015 April;51(2):207-10

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUEEUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE

A Journal on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation after Pathological Events


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM), European Union of Medical Specialists - Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section (UEMS-PRM), Mediterranean Forum of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (MFPRM), Hellenic Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (EEFIAP)
In association with International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM)
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,063

 

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2015 April;51(2):207-10

 ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Walking capacity and ability are more impaired in progressive compared to relapsing type of multiple sclerosis

Feys P. 1, Bibby B. M. 2, Baert I. 3, Dalgas U. 4

1 REVAL, University of Hasselt, REVAL/BIOMED, Diepenbeek, Belgium;
2 Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark;
3 University of Hasselt, REVAL/BIOMED, Diepenbeek, Belgium;
4 Section of Sport Sciences, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

BACKGROUND: Patients with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) have been attributed greater walking disability than relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients but quantitative data on walking speed and ability are lacking.
AIM: To investigate the impact of type of MS on severity of reduced walking ability and capacity taking into account age, sex, height and disease duration.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational multi-center study
SETTING: European MS centers providing either in- or out-patient services, or both.
POPULATION: This study included 502 patients: 259, 162 and 81 patients showed RRMS, secondary and primary progressive MS respectively.
METHODS: Walking was evaluated by T25FW, six minute walk test and MS-Walking Scale-12. Patient characteristics were compared using a one-way ANOVA, and simple and multivariate regression analysis were applied with the walking measures.
RESULTS: In adjusted (sex, age, weight, height and disease duration) analyses, walking impairments were more than 20% greater in progressive types of MS compared to RRMS. There were also indications of greater walking impairment in primary compared to secondary progressive MS patients.
CONCLUSION: Clinical walking impairment was larger in progressive compared to relapsing-remitting type of MS. The biological disease mechanism, being degeneration or inflammation, impacts on disability.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Health care professionals must be aware of different severity of walking impairment in progressive compared to relapsing type of MS, and need for intensive treatment. Also, studies must report rehabiltiation effects according to MS type.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page