Total amount: € 0,00
HOW TO ORDER
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE
A Journal on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation after Pathological Events
Official Journal of the , , , ,
In association with
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,063
European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2013 April;49(2):205-11
Pain and electrophysiological parameters are improved by combined 830-1064 high-intensity LASER in symptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome versus Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation. A randomized controlled study
Casale R. 1, Damiani C. 2, Maestri R. 3, Wells C. D. 4 ✉
1 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology and Pain Rehabilitation Unit, “Salvatore Maugeri” Foundation, IRCCS, Research and Care, Rehabilitation Institute of Montescano, Montestacano, Pavia, Italy;
2 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, San Raffaele Portuense Tosinvest, Rome, Italy;
3 Department of Bioengineering, “Salvatore Maugeri” Foundation, IRCCS, Research and Care Rehabilitation Institute of Montescano, Montescano, Pavia, Italy;
4 Pain Relief Foundation, Liverpool, UK
Aim: The aim of the study was to compare LASER versus transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in reducing pain and paraesthesia; and in improving motor and sensory median nerve conduction parameters in mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS)
Design: Randomised blinded pilot study. Patients and staff administered treatments and outcome measures were blinded.
Setting: Outpatient; Research and Care Rehabilitation Institute.
Participants: Twenty CTS symptomatic patients.
Interventions. Fifteen sessions of: 1) 100 Hz TENS (30 minutes; rectangular waves; 80 ms width, intensity below muscle contraction); 2) combined 830-1064 nm LASER (radiating dose: 250 J cm-2 delivered to the skin overlying the course of the median nerve at the wrist for 100 s at 25 W (18 W [1064 nm] + 7 W [830 nm]) via a fiber-optic probe with a spot size of ~1 cm2).
Outcome measures. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and paresthesia; median nerve distal motor latency and sensory nerve conduction velocity.
Results: LASER improved both positive and negative sensory symptoms. TENS induced clinical improvement but this was not statistically significant and was limited to pain reduction. LASER but not TENS favourably modified the neurophysiological parameters.
Conclusion: High-intensity combined LASER wavelengths of 830 nm and 1064 nm, which produce a better transparency with less scattering and a high energy transfer, are better than TENS in improving both pain and paraesthesia as well as neurophysiological parameters in CTS.