Total amount: € 0,00
Official Journal of the , , , ,
In association with
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,063
Online ISSN 1973-9095
Scaffidi M. 1, Vulpiani M. C. 1, Vetrano M. 1, Conforti F. 1, Marchetti M. R. 2, Bonifacino A. 3, Marchetti P. 4, Saraceni V. M. 1, Ferretti A. 1
1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy;
2 Physiotherapy Service, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy;
3 Senology Unit Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy;
4 Unit of Medical Oncology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is currently the most frequent tumor in women. Through the years, BC management has evolved towards conservative surgery. However, even minimally invasive surgery can cause neuromotor and/or articular impairments which can lead to permanent damage, if not adequately treated.
AIM: To clinically evaluate upper ipsilateral limb function and the impact of certain post-surgical consequences arising after invasive or breast-conserving surgery for early BC, by intervening, or not intervening, with an early rehabilitation program. To investigate physical morbidity after sentinel (SLND) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and after reconstructive surgery in the treatment of early BC.
DESIGN: Observational prospective trial.
SETTING: Inpatient and outpatient treatment.
POPULATION: Eighty-three females participated in the study: 25 patients did not begin physiotherapy during hospitalization (Group A), 58 patients received early rehabilitation treatment (Group B).
METHODS: The patients of Groups A and B were compared with respect to the following criteria: shoulder-arm mobility, upper limb function, and presence of lymphedema. All patients were assessed at 15-30, 60 and180 days after surgery.
RESULTS: Statistically significant differences, in favor of Group B, were encountered at the 180-day follow-up visit, especially with respect to articular and functional limitation of the upper limb.
CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The results of the present study show that early assisted mobilization (beginning on the first postoperative day) and home rehabilitation, in conjunction with written information on precautionary hygienic measures to observe, play a crucial role in reducing the occurrence of postoperative side-effects of the upper limb.