Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2011 March;47(1) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2011 March;47(1):19-23

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE

A Journal on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation after Pathological Events


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM), European Union of Medical Specialists - Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section (UEMS-PRM), Mediterranean Forum of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (MFPRM), Hellenic Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (EEFIAP)
In association with International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM)
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,827


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  FREEfree


European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2011 March;47(1):19-23

Copyright © 2011 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Outcomes from ischemic stroke subtypes classified by the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project: a systematic review

Paci M., Nannetti L., D’Ippolito P., Lombardi B.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Prato Hospital, Prato, Italy


FULL TEXT  


BACKGROUND: Stroke is a highly heterogeneous disorder with distinct subtypes, each presenting specific clinical aspects. Information on prognosis of ischemic stroke subtypes help to improve clinical management and rehabilitation treatments.
AIM: Summarize findings of studies on outcome in stroke subtypes categorized by use of the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project (OCSP) classification.
DESIGN: Systematic review.
SETTING: Not applicable.
POPULATION: Adult post-stroke patients.
METHODS: Systematic literature research of five databases was undertaken to identify relevant studies. Outcomes were examined in terms of impairment, activity restriction and participation restriction. Quality of Life and mortality was also examined for each study.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies met inclusion criteria. Most studies measure outcome in terms of activity limitations and participation restriction. Only one study measures impairment. TACI group have poor outcomes in comparison with other groups. Outcomes of LACI, PACI and POCI groups are controversial.
CONCLUSION: Stroke subtype is a factor influencing outcome. However, differences among groups, overall in terms of impairment, should be further investigated.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Different prognosis of stroke subtypes may imply different rehabilitation managements.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail

blombardi@usl4.toscana.it