Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2009 March;45(1) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2009 March;45(1):47-51

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE

A Journal on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation after Pathological Events


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM), European Union of Medical Specialists - Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section (UEMS-PRM), Mediterranean Forum of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (MFPRM), Hellenic Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (EEFIAP)
In association with International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM)
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,827


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  FREEfree


European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2009 March;45(1):47-51

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Prognostic factors in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation

Grasso M. G., Pace L., Troisi E., Tonini A., Paolucci S.

Santa Lucia Foundation-IRCCS, Rome, Italy


FULL TEXT  


Aim. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) and identify reliable prognostic factors.
Methods. Two hundred patients were enrolled for this study (65% females), with a mean age of 49.77+11.32 years and a mean disease duration of 17.33+10.15 years.
Results. The results of rehabilitation were assessed in the whole sample, as well as by comparing three subgroups, divided according to their basal Expanded Disability Status Scale of Kurtzke (EDSS) score: a “mild” group (EDSS score 2-5.5), a “moderate” group (EDSS 6-6.5), and a “severe” group (EDSS 7-8.5). All three subgroups of patients showed a significant improvement in functional status in both the Barthel Index and Rivermead Mobility Index (Wilcoxon Test) at discharge. However the effectiveness observed in patients with mild and moderate MS in both ADL and mobility was significantly higher than that observed in patients with the severe form.
Conclusion. A multidisciplinary rehabilitative approach should be recommended for patients with a short disease duration and a relatively moderate disability.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail