Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2009 March;45(1) > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2009 March;45(1):31-6

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE

A Journal on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation after Pathological Events


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM), European Union of Medical Specialists - Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section (UEMS-PRM), Mediterranean Forum of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (MFPRM), Hellenic Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (EEFIAP)
In association with International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM)
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,063


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 2009 March;45(1):31-6

language: English

A comparison of functional assessment instruments and work status in chronic back pain

Sivan M. 1, Sell B. 2, Sell P. 2

1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust Leicester, United Kingdom
2 Sketchley Hall Rehabilitation Centre Priory Health, Burbage, Leicesteshire, United Kingdom


FULL TEXT  


Aim. The aim of this cross sectional study was to analyse whether low back pain (LBP) functional assessment instruments correlate well with work status measures.
Methods. This study was a cross sectional study that enrolled 375 patients with chronic LBP attending back pain outpatient clinics of a University Hospital and a specialist rehabilitation centre over a period of one year. The outcome scores measured were Oswestry Disability Index, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. The effect of back pain on their work status was also recorded and correlated to the above instrument values.
Results. There was a only a modest correlation between work status and the three measured outcome scores, with the Spearman rank correlation being 0.47 for OMPQ, 0.43 for ODI and 0.39 for RMQ.
Conclusion. The studied standard LBP outcome measures and work status are not interchangeable. The impact on work status should not be assumed based on the severity of these outcome measures and should be recorded as a separate outcome measure in chronic low back pain.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail