Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > Europa Medicophysica 2005 December;41(4) > Europa Medicophysica 2005 December;41(4):275-81

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE

A Journal on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation after Pathological Events


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM), European Union of Medical Specialists - Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section (UEMS-PRM), Mediterranean Forum of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (MFPRM), Hellenic Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (EEFIAP)
In association with International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM)
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,827


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  FREEfree


Europa Medicophysica 2005 December;41(4):275-81

Copyright © 2005 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Critical comparison of nine different self-administered questionnaires for the evaluation of disability caused by low back pain

Rocchi M. B. L. 1, Sisti D. 1, Benedetti P. 2, Valentini M. 3, Bellagam-ba S. 3, Federici A. 3

1 Institute of Biomathematics University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy 2 Division of Internal Medicine S. Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Urbino, Italy 3 Institute for Motor Activity Research University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy


FULL TEXT  


Aim. The aim of this study was to critically compare 9 self-administered questionnaires designed to evaluate disability caused by back pain.
Methods. The questionnaires were analyzed considering and comparing their psychometric characteristics (reliability, validity, responsiveness, minimal clinically relevant difference), together with other practical and technical aspects (number of items, number and kind of domains, scaling of items, scoring, time to complete, validated translations, etc.). Data were obtained from scientific literature.
Results. Only 3 out of 9 analyzed instruments (i.e., the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire, the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, and the Roland-Morris Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) appear fully validated from a psychometric standpoint.
Conclusion. On the basis of psychometric evaluations as well as feasibility considerations, the authors suggest using either the Roland-Morris or Oswestry questionnaire as the best assessment of the level of disability caused by back pain.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail