Home > Journals > European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine > Past Issues > Europa Medicophysica 1999 September;35(3) > Europa Medicophysica 1999 September;35(3):125-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE

A Journal on Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation after Pathological Events


Official Journal of the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER), European Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ESPRM), European Union of Medical Specialists - Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Section (UEMS-PRM), Mediterranean Forum of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (MFPRM), Hellenic Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (EEFIAP)
In association with International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (ISPRM)
Indexed/Abstracted in: CINAHL, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,063


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Europa Medicophysica 1999 September;35(3):125-8

language: English

Cardiac reha­bil­i­ta­tion. The con­tin­u­ing ­need for in-­patient pro­grammes

Disler P., Bradd J., Foldesi T., Da Silva C., McConachy D., Lowthian P.

Victorian Rehabilitation, Research Institute Cedar Court Health South Rehabilitation, Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia


FULL TEXT  


BACKGROUND: To aud­it the out­comes of old­er, depen­dent ­patients, admit­ted for an inpa­tient car­diac reha­bil­i­ta­tion pro­gramme.
METHODS: Design: cross sec­tion­al aud­it of hos­pi­tal ­records. Participants and set­ting: 57 ­patients ­over the age of 65 ­years, admit­ted for inpa­tient car­diac reha­bil­i­ta­tion to the Cedar Court Health South Rehabilitation Hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
RESULTS: After a rel­a­tive­ly ­brief peri­od of in-­patient reha­bil­i­ta­tion, ­there was a sta­tis­ti­cal­ly sig­nif­i­cant ­increase in the ­patients’ inde­pen­dence in activ­ities of dai­ly liv­ing (as ­assessed by a stan­dar­dised ­tool, the FIM) and a pos­i­tive ­change in ­both anx­ie­ty and depres­sion. All ­patients ­were dis­charged ­home.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the ­increased avail­abil­ity of out­pa­tient car­diac reha­bil­i­ta­tion pro­grammes, ­there con­tin­ues to be a ­demand for inpa­tient pro­grammes for select­ed ­patients ­after ­acute car­diac treat­ment. Participa­tion in the aud­it­ed pro­gramme, result­ed in excel­lent reha­bil­i­ta­tion out­comes.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail