Home > Journals > Esperienze Dermatologiche > Past Issues > Esperienze Dermatologiche 2014 September;16(3) > Esperienze Dermatologiche 2014 September;16(3):147-52

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

ESPERIENZE DERMATOLOGICHE

A Journal on Dermatology


Journal of Istituto Dermatologico San Gallicano
Official Journal of the Associazione Dermatologi Ospedalieri Italiani - A.D.O.I.
Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, Scopus

 

TECHNICAL NOTES  


Esperienze Dermatologiche 2014 September;16(3):147-52

Copyright © 2014 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: Italian

Final results of an experimental research about a technique for measuring skin lesions

Crisci A., Crisci M., Boccalone E.

Servizio di Dermochirurgia, Trapianti Cutanei e Centro Ferite Difficili, Casa di Cura “Villa Fiorita”, Aversa, (CE), Italia


PDF  


AIM: The aim of this research was to find a simple and relatively unexpensive method to measure an ulcerative or neoplastic skin lesion.
METHODS: During our experimental study we examined various skin lesions and performed some mathematical calculations. A total of 1440 skin lesions (trophic ulcers, vascular, skin cancer, etc..) were examined over a ten-year period (2002-2012). Lesions were first photographed and then subjected to a geometric exam and to mathematical and statistical calculations.
RESULTS: From these tests it can be deduced that there is no statistically significant difference between the values of AR (real area) and ARI°C (hypotetical area with the radius of the first circle)+14.81% (P=0.160) and AR and AE+2.25% (P=0.936), with an Index Probability of >0.05, even though the equality is greater between AR and AE+2.25% (Variance: P=0.993, t-test: P=0.998; c2: P=1.000) compared to the relationship between AR and ARI°C +14.81% (variance: P=0.819, t-test: P=0.813; c2: P=1.000). This fact might imply that AE+2.25% could be of greater use compared to ARI°C+14.81% to evaluate the surface of a lesion in place of AR.
CONCLUSIONS: It can therefore be concluded that by increasing the value of AE by 2.25% you get the value of AR. This calculation is very rapid and can be easily repeated in case of doubt or suspicion.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail