Home > Journals > Chirurgia > Past Issues > Chirurgia 1999 October;12(5) > Chirurgia 1999 October;12(5):345-8

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

CHIRURGIA

A Journal on Surgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Chirurgia 1999 October;12(5):345-8

language: Italian

Emergency thoracotomy

Pagan V., Moretti R., Busetto A., Barbaresco S., Fontana P.


Full text temporarily not available online. Contact us  


Background. The usefulness of emergency thoracotomy is still controversial. Personal experience on the role of emergency thoracotomy is presented.
Methods. In the last twenty years 159 patients with thoracic injuries (12% of all our patients with chest trauma) have been treated by surgical exploration. Forty-two patients underwent an emergency thoracotomy (EMT): 23 for blunt chest trauma and 19 for penetrating injuries. The EMT was required mostly because of hemorrhagic shock (76%), followed by cardiac injury or tamponade (17%), and respiratory distress (7%). An anterior or antero-lateral thoracotomic access was preferentially adopted. 85% of EMTs was performed in the O.R. (mortality 35%), 12% in the E.R. (mortality 60%) and 5% in the diagnostic setting or en route for the O.R. (mortality 100%). Extracorporeal circulatory assistance has been employed in 5 patients and intraoperative autotransfusion in 10.
Results. Twenty-five patients survived, for an overall survival of 59%. Half of the deaths occurred during thoracotomy and the other half postoperatively, most of them due to multiorgan failure.
Conclusions. In this series emergency thoracotomy showed to improve the prognosis of both severe blunt and penetrating chest trauma.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail