Advanced Search

Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 August;57(4) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 August;57(4):519-39

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUETHE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

A Journal on Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery

Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,632

Frequency: Bi-Monthly

ISSN 0021-9509

Online ISSN 1827-191X

 

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2016 August;57(4):519-39

VASCULAR SECTION 

    REVIEWS

Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: updated meta-analysis, metaregression and trial sequential analysis of short-term and intermediate-to long-term outcomes of randomized trials

Thomas LUEBKE, Jan BRUNKWALL

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

INTRODUCTION: To compare carotid artery stenting (CAS) versus carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in the treatment of carotid stenosis, including two recently published, prospective, randomized trials of these therapies.
EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A multiple electronic health database search on all randomized trials describing CAS compared with CEA in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis was performed. Primary outcomes were death, stroke, and myocardial infarction.
EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Carotid artery stenting as compared with CEA was associated with a 61% increase in the risk of periprocedural death or stroke (Peto OR, 1.609; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.193-2.170; P=0.002). The trial sequential monitoring boundary was crossed by the cumulative Z-curve, suggesting firm evidence for at least a 20% relative risk increase of periprocedural death or stroke and any stroke compared with CEA. Carotid artery stenting as compared with CEA was associated with a 42% increase in the risk for the composite of periprocedural stroke or death plus ipsilateral stroke thereafter (Peto OR, 1.417; 95% CI: 1.074-1.870; P=0.0014).
CONCLUSIONS: In this largest and most comprehensive meta-analysis to date using outcomes that are standard in contemporary studies, CAS was associated with an increased risk of both periprocedural and intermediate- to long-term outcomes.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page