Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2015 June;56(3) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2015 June;56(3):401-7

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints
Cite this article as

THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

A Journal on Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,179


eTOC

 

  ACUTE LOWER EXTREMITY ISCHEMIA


The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2015 June;56(3):401-7

Copyright © 2015 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

The pros and cons of endovascular and open surgical treatments for patients with acute limb ischemia

Branco B. C. 1, Montero-Baker M. F. 2, Mills J. L. Sr. 2

1 Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA; 2 Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA


PDF  


The present review addresses the pros and cons of the current, wide variety of therapeutic options available for the treatment of acute limb ischemia (ALI). Despite five prospective randomized controlled trials comparing catheter directed thrombolysis and open surgical revascularization, no single treatment strategy can yet be considered optimal for patients with ALI. This report includes 20 years of published data to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of thrombolytic agents and adjunctive endovascular techniques when compared to open surgical revascularization.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Branco BC, Montero-Baker MF, Mills JL Sr.. The pros and cons of endovascular and open surgical treatments for patients with acute limb ischemia. J Cardiovasc Surg 2015 June;56(3):401-7. 

Corresponding author e-mail

jmills@u.arizona.edu