Advanced Search

Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2015 April;56(2) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2015 April;56(2):153-7

ISSUES AND ARTICLES   MOST READ   eTOC

CURRENT ISSUETHE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

A Journal on Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,632

 

The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2015 April;56(2):153-7

UPDATE ON MANAGEMENT OF CAROTID, AORTIC AND PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL PATHOLOGIES 

 CAROTID ARTERY

Carotid artery stenting: high-risk interventionist versus high-risk center

Paraskevas K. I., Loftus I. M.

St. George’s Vascular Institute, St. George’s Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a less invasive alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the management of carotid artery stenosis. Although early multicenter randomized controlled trials reported inferior results for CAS compared with CEA, recent advances in technology and increasing CAS operator expertise have lead to improved results. As with any procedure, a high caseload translates into increased experience and better outcomes. This article discusses the current shortfalls of CAS, as well as the various options available to improve CAS results. The majority of studies suggest that there is an inverse relationship between caseload volume and CAS outcomes that defines high-risk interventionists and high-risk centers. Centralizing CAS procedures to high-volume centers is essential for optimization of CAS outcomes.

language: English


FULL TEXT  REPRINTS

top of page