Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2009 October;50(5) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2009 October;50(5):677-81

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

A Journal on Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,632


eTOC

 

REVIEWS  VASCULAR SECTION


The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2009 October;50(5):677-81

language: English

Choice of access for percutaneous carotid angioplasty and stenting: a comparative study on cervical and femoral access

Mathieu X., Piret V., Bergeron P., Petrosyan A., Abdulamit T., Trastour J. C.

Hopital Saint Joseph, Marseille, France


PDF  


Carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) is a well established technique. CAS indications currently still limited are yet evolving. The choice of the access is defined by the risk factors of the patient among whom “the vascular anatomy” is essential. The authors will focus here on the accesses, their advantages and their drawbacks. They made a retrospective study relating 314 patients treated by CAS. No significant difference in term of morbidity or mortality between the cervical or femoral access was found but a clear tendency in favor of the cervical access which avoids the arch manipulations. It can be concluded that various access offer better options for CAS and must be discussed depending on the patient’s anatomy and risks factors.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail