Total amount: € 0,00
Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 1,632
Online ISSN 1827-191X
Schachner T., Laufer G., Vertacnik K., Bonaros N., Nagiller J., Bonatti J.
Department of Cardiac Surgery Innsbruck University Hospital, Innsbruck, Austria
Aim. The axillary artery is currently gaining interest as an alternative to femoral artery cannulation in aortic surgery. It was the aim of our study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of axillary artery cannulation in a series of patients undergoing surgery of the ascending aorta and/or the aortic arch.
Methods. From 1998 to 2002 cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) perfusion via the axillary artery was intended in 35 patients (28 male), median age 61 (22-77) years. The underlying disease was acute aortic dissection type A in 22/35 (63%), chronic aortic dissection type A in 2/35 (6%), ascending aortic aneurysm in 8/35 (22%), aortic regurgitation after previous ascending aortic replacement in 1/35 (3%), pseudoaneurysm after Bentall operation in 1/35 (3%) and coronary artery disease with severe arteriosclerosis of the aorta in 1/35 (3%).
Results. Conversion to femoral artery or ascending aortic cannulation was necessary in 3 patients. In the other cases, adequate CPB flows of 2.4 l/m2/min were achieved. In 1 case local dissection of the axillary artery occurred after emergency cannulation. No postoperative complications related to axillary artery cannulation, such as upper extremity ischemia, brachial plexus injury, or local wound infection occurred. No new postoperative stroke was noted, hospital mortality was 4/35 (11%) patients.
Conclusion. Axillary artery cannulation is feasible in the majority of cases and seems to be a safe and effective method in surgery of the ascending aorta and aortic arch. Several disadvantages of femoral artery cannulation and perfusion can be avoided.