Home > Journals > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery > Past Issues > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2003 August;44(4) > The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2003 August;44(4):481-502

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

THE JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY

A Journal on Cardiac, Vascular and Thoracic Surgery


Indexed/Abstracted in: BIOSIS Previews, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Citation Index Expanded (SciSearch), Scopus
Impact Factor 2,179


eTOC

 

  ENDOVASCULAR REPAIR OF ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSMS


The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 2003 August;44(4):481-502

Copyright © 2009 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Current concepts and controversies in endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Hinchliffe R. J., Hopkinson B. R.

Division of Vascular Surgery University Hospital, Nottingham, UK


PDF  


Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has rapidly expanded since its introduction in the early 1990s. Early experiences were understandably associated with relatively high rates of complications including conversion to open repair. Soon, perioperative morbidity and mortality results improved but these concerns were replaced by questions over the long-term effectiveness of the endovascular method highlighted by the increasing numbers of secondary interventions and even reports of aneurysm rupture. A better understanding of the behaviour of stent-grafts in the aorta and the response of aortic aneurysms to endovascular repair has been forged by observations both in vitro and in vivo. It was only relatively recently that terms such as migration and endoleak were coined. Only now that we are beginning to fully understand the causes and consequences of such problems can further developments be made. The following paper outlines some of the concepts and discusses the controversies and challenges facing clinicians involved in endovascular aneurysm surgery today.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail