Home > Journals > Acta Vulnologica > Past Issues > Acta Vulnologica 2010 September;8(3) > Acta Vulnologica 2010 September;8(3):135-9

CURRENT ISSUE
 

ARTICLE TOOLS

Reprints

ACTA VULNOLOGICA

A Journal on Physiopathology and Therapy of Chronic Cutaneous Ulcers


Official Journal of the Italian Association for Cutaneous Ulcers
Indexed/Abstracted in: EMBASE, Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index


eTOC

 

ORIGINAL ARTICLES  


Acta Vulnologica 2010 September;8(3):135-9

Copyright © 2010 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA

language: English

Outpatient management of “hard-to-heal” chronic ulcers with vacuum-assisted-closure therapy

Rivolta N. 1, Buscarini E. 1, Maida S. 1, Riva F. 1, Piffaretti G. 1, Tozzi M. 1, Annoni M. 3, Mariscalco G. 2, Castelli P. 1

1 Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Varese University Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; 2 Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Varese University Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy; 3 General Surgery 1, Department of Surgical Sciences, Varese University Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy


PDF  


Aim. The aim of this study was to compare the results of vacuum-assisted-closure therapy versus conventional foam dressing treatment on “hard-to-heal” ulcers.
Methods. The study enrolled 56 patients who presented at the hospital between January 2007 and September 2008. Conventionally treated group (group A) included the first 42 ulcers; 20 ulcers (32.2%) were treated with vacuum-assisted-closure therapy (group B).
Results. Primary end-point was 100% in group A, and 85% in group B. Mean healing time was 151 ± 22 days in group A vs.117 ± 12 days in group B (P=0.005). At one-year follow-up visit, 24 (57.1%) ulcers reappeared in group A and 5 (29.4%) in group B (P=0.05); freedom from recurrence was two months in group A vs. four months in group B.
Conclusion. Vacuum-assisted-closure therapy obtained similar overall healing rate of conventional medications but in shorter time. In addition, freedom from recurrence was longer than standard treatment.

top of page

Publication History

Cite this article as

Corresponding author e-mail